Texas Flood Tragedy
This article was written by dr. Matthew Wielicki and was previously published on July 6, 2025 on his website Irrational Fear.
A Call for Truth and Action, Not Political Exploitation
The heartbreaking flooding in central Texas, including the devastating loss of young lives at a girls’ camp near Austin, is a tragedy that demands reflection, accountability, and action, not political grandstanding. This catastrophe, while deeply painful, must be examined through a lens of historical and scientific clarity, not hijacked to push climate change or budgetary blame games.
https://www.cnn.com/weather/live-news/texas-flooding-camp-mystic-07-06-25-hnk
The Flooding Crisis: What Happened?
Historical Context of Texas Flooding
According to extensive research, including the recent Texas A&M 2024 Climate Report, river flooding in central Texas has not demonstrated a significant long-term increasing trend. The report explicitly states,
“No long-term river flooding trend has been identified in the observations, nor is such a trend projected at this point…”
Evaluating the Official Government Reports
Additionally, NOAA and Texas A&M climate data explicitly contradict claims that extreme rainfall frequency and flooding are unprecedented or primarily climate-driven. Central Texas has experienced variable rainfall trends, with recent decades showing primarily decreasing precipitation, dependent largely upon specific locations within the state. EPA data plots show variability rather than clear upward trends in flooding events, undermining the narrative that climate change alone drives increased flooding… unless climate change is only working in certain parts of the country.
This figure shows changes in the size of flooding events in rivers and streams in the United States between 1965 and 2015. Blue upward-pointing symbols show locations where floods have become larger; brown downward-pointing symbols show locations where floods have become smaller. The larger, solid-color symbols represent stations where the change was statistically significant. Source: https://www.epa.gov/climate-indicators/climate-change-indicators-river-flooding
Dissecting the Climate Narrative and Political Exploitation
One particularly egregious example is a recent statement by Jay Inslee, who attempted to link President Trump’s policy actions on renewable energy directly to the Texas floods, claiming cuts to solar and wind energy have exacerbated extreme weather.
This claim is not only scientifically baseless but profoundly insensitive, using tragedy to push a political agenda.
However, historical records of flood-related fatalities…
clearly shows no definitive upward trend correlating with agency budgets, GHG concentration, or global average temperature. Death tolls from flooding fluctuate year-to-year without demonstrable dependence on changes in agency staffing or funding. These data-driven insights expose the politically motivated nature of claims linking recent budgetary decisions to tragic fatalities.
The Reality of Warnings and Response
“According to the National Weather Service website, the flash flood watch, which included Kerr County, was issued at 1:18 p.m. Thursday. Nearly 12 hours later, a “life threatening” flash flood warning was issued at 1:14 a.m., according to the website.”
Despite this clear and timely warning, the emergency response and community preparedness failed catastrophically. The failure was one of planning, zoning, and infrastructure, not the availability or accuracy of weather data, nor GHG concentration.
Real Solutions, Not Climate Alarmism
Practical solutions exist: strengthening flood infrastructure, improving land-use zoning, investing in better emergency management systems, and implementing stricter regulations to restrict development in flood-prone areas. These solutions are immediate, actionable, and demonstrably effective, unlike vague climate-oriented rhetoric.
A Commitment to Continuous Data-Driven Updates
more news
Women are speaking out against the climate agenda
In the climate debate, it is mainly older, often retired male scientists who are challenging the prevailing paradigm. Female skeptics are few and far between. However, this has been changing recently. Both in science and the media, women are increasingly speaking out against what they see as a frightening and socially disruptive agenda. This is a positive development.
A review of The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC, part 2
Clintel has analyzed IPCC’s Assessment Report 6 (AR6) and has published an important report on it, entitled: The Frozen Climate Views of the IPCC. It’s a report that provides many serious criticisms of the work carried out by the IPCC. Here you find the second and last part of a review of this important work by Clintel, recently published by the French website Climat et Vérité.
Javier Vinós on the Hunga Tonga Eruption and its extraordinary Climate Effects
In a recent ICSF/Clintel lecture, Dr. Javier Vinós argued that the January 15, 2022 Hunga Tonga eruption was the main cause of the extraordinary global climate anomalies of 2023–2024. He describes them as the first genuine multi-year global climate event in roughly 80 years, widely misinterpreted by mainstream analyses.
