What If Everything You Thought About CO2 Was Wrong?
In my web browsing today, I stumbled upon a video posted yesterday by Robin Horsley, which is based on my work. I was impressed with the simple, beautiful and convincing way he presents my findings, and goes beyond them to what they mean, in just 8 minutes.
I didn’t know Robin Horsley, but the video intrigued me and I found some information he gives about himself.
His video, which is linked below, is an honour for me and I am grateful to him.
The youtube page gives the following description of the video.
‘What If Everything You Thought About CO₂ Was Wrong?’ dives deep into one of the most provocative challenges to the mainstream climate narrative. For decades, we’ve been told that human-generated CO₂ is the leading cause of global warming, driving apocalyptic policies and shaping global agendas. But what if this foundational belief is flawed?
This film explores groundbreaking research by Professor Demetris Koutsoyiannis, who argues that rising CO₂ levels are not the cause of global warming but its consequence. Supported by historical ice core data and natural processes, his findings raise serious questions about the simplistic story we’ve been fed for years. The film examines natural CO₂ emissions from oceans and decaying plant life, which account for 96% of the total, leaving human contributions as a mere 4%. It challenges long-held assumptions about CO₂’s role as a greenhouse gas and casts doubt on the effectiveness of Net Zero policies, which could cost up to $150 trillion by 2050. What if these funds could be better spent mitigating the effects of climate change or eradicating poverty and disease?
This isn’t about denying climate change; it’s a call to scrutinise the science driving monumental decisions. Are we solving the right problem, or simply following a narrative that benefits the few at an unimaginable cost?
more news
The New York Times Reaches Acceptance Stage
The climate movement has run headlong into the limits of political reality, writes Charles Rotter, in reaction to a fascinating article in the New York Times. "What activists once dressed up as a “moral obligation” has been reduced to technocratic jargon: pragmatism, realism, difficulty. Translation: it’s over."
New York Times admits: global climate policy has failed
The World Comes to Its Senses The New York Times heralded the end of climate policy with a lengthy lament by David Wallace-Wells entitled “It's not just the US—the whole world has had enough of climate policy". The article seems like an unintended admission that the era of the Paris Agreement is [...]
Crisis or hoax?, a new book by former Dutch parliamentarian
Crisis or hoax?, a new book by former Dutch parliamentarian In Crisis or Hoax?, earth scientist and former Dutch parliamentarian Jules de Waart critically examines the IPCC's CO2-driven climate change narrative, arguing the science is unsettled and lacks robust evidence. Drawing on his expertise in climatology and political science, he challenges the [...]
