Global Warning, a genuine attempt to be objective about climate

Canadian filmmaker Mathew Embry (Painkiller: Inside the Opioid Crisis) has released a remastered edition of his 2019 climate documentary Global Warning. It is more relevant than ever and is one of the few genuine attempts by the media to take a truly objective look at the climate debate.

Climate Intelligence (Clintel) is an independent foundation informing people about climate change and climate policies.
Global Warning: the climate documentary that asks difficult questions

Global Warming (screenshot)

Clintel Foundation
Date: 20 June 2026

SHARE:

In 2019, the documentary Global Warning challenged Canada to have a honest conversation about climate change, conventional energy, Indigenous voices, environmental activism, and the future of the country. Today, that conversation matters more than ever. Filmmaker Mathew Embry (Living Proof, Painkiller: Inside the Opioid Crisis) has released a remastered edition of the documentary that dared to ask the questions few others would.

You can see the entire documentary below in the enhanced, remastered edition:

Global Warning returns to a world that has caught up to its message. The fears have shifted. The policies are changing. The stakes have never been higher. And the human cost of how we power our lives has never been more visible. This is a film built on contradictions it refuses to resolve for you. A celebrated climate campaigner who believes Canada has never met a target it couldn’t miss. A self-made business titan watching his life’s work hollowed out. Scientists who question the catastrophe. An indigenous elder who speaks not of carbon or quotas, but of the children we leave behind — “it’s written in rock,” he says, “not on paper.”

Global Warning refuses to pick a side for you. It is, in Embry’s words, a “pro-human” film, one that holds space for the warming planet and the people whose lives are upended by the policies meant to save it. The world hasn’t ended. The conversation is just beginning.

The article you have just read was made possible by our donors.

Every day, Clintel publishes articles on climate, energy and science. We also translate and share international analyses in multiple languages, produce videos, publish reports and organize conferences and events around the world.

We receive no government funding and rely entirely on the support of our donors. Your support helps us promote independent research and contribute to a more open and balanced debate on climate and energy issues.

Would you like to support our work? Choose the option that suits you best:

Become a Friend of Clintel – support us with an annual contribution
Make a recurring donation – provide ongoing support and help us plan ahead
Make a one-time donation – every contribution helps

Thank you for your support.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Climate Intelligence Clintel

more news

OECD and Brussels Still Want Banks to Pick ‘Climate Winners’

The OECD is risking US wrath by pushing ahead with green finance initiatives despite Washington calling time on Net Zero, says Tilak Doshi. Its new report on climate regulation has Brussels's fingerprints all over it.

Trump tells US power plants to emit as much CO2 as they want

The EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) has announced that they will scrap the limits set for ‘climate pollution’ from US power plants. Jo Nova thinks that the mission creep of bureaucrats may finally be coming to an end: Slaying the Bureaucratic Blob.

How Much of a Threat Are Melting Ice Sheets and Glaciers?

The recent tragic Himalayan flash flood (the source was actually a landslide of the underlying bedrock) has brought to the fore an important question, says Ralph Alexander. How much do we need to be concerned about melting ice, from both glaciers and ice sheets?

By |2026-06-19T15:39:20+02:00June 20, 2026|Comments Off on Global Warning, a genuine attempt to be objective about climate
Go to Top