Clintel at Heartland Conference: new terminology in climate debate needed
At the Heartland Conference in Washington, D.C., Clintel highlighted new perspectives on climate science, including the benefits of CO₂-driven global greening and the need for a renewed vocabulary in the climate debate, as presented by Marcel Crok.
Marcel Crok
Peter Baeten
Date: 11 April 2026
Last week (April 8 and 9), Clintel attended the 16th International Conference on Climate Change in Washington, D.C., organized by the Heartland Institute. Clintel Director Marcel Crok was one of the speakers at this important annual climate-realist conference. The focus of his presentation was on the significant (positive impact of the) greening of the Earth due to the increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. This greening effect is now undeniable and also has a positive impact on global agricultural yields.
New language and vocabulary are needed
Clintel’s American branch, Climate Intel, led by researcher Forrest Frantz, is also closely monitoring this greening effect and contributed to the data presented. Frantz has also put forward striking suggestions regarding the language used in the climate debate, a topic Marcel also addressed in his presentation. Language plays an enormous role in how people experience the climate debate. Climate alarmists have been using this to their advantage since the beginning of the discussion. Crok and Frantz therefore advocate that the climate-realist side also start using new, more positive terms. As a start, Crok offered six concrete suggestions:
Emissions is replaced by: Restoration of CO2 to the air
Fossil fuels becomes: Natural Organic Energy
Carbon dioxide changes into: CO2, Earth’s Oxygen-of-Life
Climate change becomes: climate (because the climate is always changing anyway)
Greenhouse gas is replaced by: Active IR-effect of CO2
H2O and CO2 emissions from power plants becomes: Atmospheric rivers of life
Watch Marcel Crok’s lecture below:
more news
The Energy Nobody Counts
We spend a great deal of time discussing how much energy our electricity systems can “produce” but far less attention is given to a different question: how much energy does it take to build them in the first place? Energy expert dr. Lars Schernikau explains why this is important.
“Svensmark’s research must continue”
Henrik Svensmark has lost his position at the Technical University of Denmark (DTU), and the research field he helped establish is being significantly downgraded. Now private donors, companies, philanthropic foundations and research funders around the world have an opportunity to demonstrate whether they genuinely support scientific freedom – including research where the politically convenient answer is not known in advance, says Karl Iver Dahl-Madsen.
How Roger Pielke Jr. Became Voldemort in Climate Science
Climate scientist and public-policy scholar Roger Pielke Jr. argues that the climate debate has become increasingly detached from the underlying evidence. In a wide-ranging interview on the Love Journalism show, Pielke discussed extreme weather, climate scenarios, decarbonisation, energy policy, political polarisation, journalism and his transition from academia to becoming one of Substack’s most widely read climate writers.
