The climate house of cards is collapsing, as became clear last week at the IPCC meeting in Ethiopia. The climate narrative has never had any substance, and now that the flow of funding is being cut off, there will soon be nothing left, says Wim Röst, Chair of the Clintel Board.
Global burned area was 18% below average this past season and has been falling for two decades. Why is that only one sentence in the annual State of Wildfires report, Charles Rotter asks.
In a series of articles physicist Ralph B. Alexander examines whether weather extremes are becoming more frequent or intense. Following his previous article on hurricanes, this installment focuses on tornadoes.
Reports that climate change is the biggest threat to tourism are nonsense, says Linnea Lueken.
Dutch engineer, entrepreneur and climate researcher Theo Wolters used his presentation at the EIKE Conference to challenge one of the central assumptions underlying current climate policy: that science has conclusively established that human CO2 emissions are responsible for the recent global warming and that this warming is potentially catastrophic.
Climate is such a dirty word now, that even the Headquarters of Globalist Lefty Communication (The New York Times) is telling their team to abandon it, says Jo Nova. “They never change the policy, they just change the language.”
It looks like climate activists accidentally made a $180 million dollar mass-market movie that only appeals to the doomster greenie fringe who hate old white men and Big Oil, says Jo Nova.
Can we now declare that the hypothesis that increased global temperatures cause increased hurricane frequency and intensity has been definitively falsified? And if not, when can we declare it, Francis Menton wonders.
Malthusian gloom never really goes out of fashion; it merely changes its wardrobe. Where the Club of Rome had mainframe computers and system dynamics diagrams, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) has Earth-system modelling and a “Planetary Health Check” branded website. The underlying choice on offer, then as now, is the same: either humanity abandons industrial civilisation or it faces Armageddon.
In a series of articles on extreme weather attribution, physicist Ralph B. Alexander examines whether observational evidence supports claims that weather extremes are becoming more frequent or intense. Following his previous article on floods, this installment focuses on hurricanes and typhoons.
