Global rice production has nearly doubled over 50 years despite climate change
Global rice production nearly doubled between the 1960s and the 2010s and rising atmospheric CO2 was the primary environmental factor contributing to increased production.
“… rising atmospheric CO2 was the primary environmental factor contributing to increased rice production by enhancing photosynthesis and improving water-use efficiency …”
from phys.org:
Global rice production has nearly doubled over 50 years despite climate change
by Lois Yoksoulian, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
edited by Stephanie Baum, reviewed by Robert EganGlobal rice production nearly doubled between the 1960s and the 2010s, despite the negative impacts of climate change, according to a new study from the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. The study found that management decisions—including expanded irrigation and increased nutrient inputs—played a central role in sustaining rice production and offsetting climate-related losses. The results suggest that future food security will depend not only on environmental conditions but also on how rice production systems are managed and adapted to changing conditions.
The study by climate, meteorology and atmospheric sciences professor Atul Jain and former graduate student Tzu-Shun Lin, combined observations and process-based modeling to examine the factors that shaped global rice production over the past half-century. The researchers evaluated how environmental change and agricultural management together influenced rice production across regions and over time. The results are published in the journal Scientific Reports.
…
The study also demonstrates that climate change is the only factor in the analysis that reduced rice production, lowering global production by an estimated 7% between 2006 and 2015 because of warming temperatures, heat stress and water shortages. In contrast, rising atmospheric CO2 was the primary environmental factor contributing to increased rice production by enhancing photosynthesis and improving water-use efficiency. Together, these findings illustrate the complex and sometimes opposing ways in which environmental changes influence agricultural production.
…
Read more: https://phys.org/news/2026-06-global-rice-production-years-climate.html
Abstract
Here’s the abstract of the study (headline: Management practices and elevated atmospheric CO2 levels helped to sustain a high level of global rice production); Tzu-Shun Lin & Atul K. Jain in Scientific Reports (3 June 2026):
We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.
Abstract
Rice is a staple agricultural resource for over half the global population. Using the data-modeling methods, which account for major biophysical processes and all major environmental and management factors, our study shows that rice production for 2006–2015 has increased by almost 2-fold since the 1960s, despite growing concerns about climate change and other extreme climate event risks. Management practices through the expansion of irrigated and non-irrigated cropping harvested areas and the increased rates of N fertilizer and manure application have helped to maintain higher production rates since the 1960s. The global production of rice for the decade 2006–2015 was 713 million tons per year, with South and Southeast Asia by far the largest rice-producing region, and China (24%), India (22%), and Thailand (9%) being the top three producers. Multiple cropping increases overall production, with the highest rice yield in season one due to a longer growing period and favorable conditions, while yields decline in the subsequent seasons. The results show that global transplanted rice yields are 25% higher than direct-seeded rice yields. Accounting for the effects of management factors, the total production increased by 76%. The expansion of rice-planting areas was the primary management contributing factor (52%), with the expansion of irrigated planted areas contributing 39% and rainfed 13%. Other management practices that helped increase production include N fertilizer and manure (24%). Our results also reveal that environmental factors increased productivity by 24% in the recent decade, with rising atmospheric CO2 concentration increasing productivity by 30% and N deposition by 1%. In contrast, climate change reduced production by 7%. These findings highlight the critical role of management practices, especially the expansion of irrigated areas and fertilizer use, in driving recent increases in rice production. Accounting for these factors is crucial for accurate projections and effective rice cultivation planning.
Read more: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-026-55973-0
An interesting contrast – the study abstract (admittedly in draft) mentions CO2 fertilisation in the title, but you have to read down to the 4th paragraph in the phys.org article to learn CO2 played a significant role. Almost like phys.org are reluctant to tell their audience CO2 can do anything good.
So how much further could yields increase? Likely quite a lot.
Commercial greenhouses elevate CO2 levels to over twice the atmospheric CO2 to stimulate growth. As we burn the remaining fossil fuel reserves over the coming 2-3 centuries, CO2 fertilisation will continue to drive yields up, even without the benefits of future agricultural science.
The only question is, what will our descendants do to keep CO2 levels elevated, once the fossil fuel runs out?
more news
IPCC Admits Apocalyptic Climate Scenarios Are “Implausible”
Almost every fearmongering mainstream media climate headline and story that has been written over the last 15 years is junk, says Chris Morrison.
The IPCC’s doomsday scenario is dead, but not yet buried
Finally, the IPCC’s doomsday scenario is being tossed in the trash. The Dutch newspaper De Volkskrant deemed the news important enough for the front page. Marcel Crok wrote as early as 2018 that the IPCC’s extreme scenario was untenable. However, the wheels of science turn slowly, and so it took more than eight years for this insight to be recognized by the scientific community.
Samuel Furfari on COP’s and climate policy: “Just blah blah”
In a recent podcast with Tom Nelson, energy expert Prof. Samuel Furfari speaks about the nonsense of COP’s and of climate policy in general. But he is also cautiously optimistic about the future: “If the next UN leader comes from Africa or Asia rather than Europe, they may adopt a more pragmatic and ‘sober vision’ of climate policy.”






