COP30 Is Lying To Justify Its Existence
COP30 is building its case on climate misinformation that rewrites the past to claim a victory it never earned.
The COP30 agreement claims the world was previously on track for more than 4C of warming until the Paris Agreement heroically “bent” that trajectory down to 2.3–2.5C:
However, “this is misinformation,” says Roger Pielke Jr., Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Colorado Boulder. It is a fiction built on the carcass of RCP8.5 — the extreme scenario that scientists quietly abandoned years ago because it required impossible coal use, implausible demographics and an economic collapse that never happened.
COP30 is resurrecting an unrealistic, disowned scenario in order to claim that Paris saved the world. The problem is the data. Real-world emissions show no curve bending, no slowdown and no “Paris effect”.
Paris didn’t change emissions, but it did unlock a permanent justification for climate taxation, energy rationing and the dismantling of cheap, reliable power — the foundation of economic prosperity.
COP30 needs a victory to justify its existence. So it has rewritten history: invent a 4C trajectory, pretend Paris knocked it down, and congratulate itself for saving humanity.
The world was never heading for RCP8.5. Paris didn’t change emissions.
Lies.
more news
Global Turmoil Proves Urgency of Energy Independence
Global Turmoil Proves Urgency of Energy Independence In this article, Vijay Jayaraj makes it clear that the geopolitical situation is now really forcing us to return to fossil fuels for our energy supply. publications Shutterstock Clintel Foundation Date: 23 June 2025 [...]
Professor Judith Curry: Climate Science Has Become Pseudo Science
Renowned climatologist Dr. Judith Curry debunks the myth of a climate consensus, revealing deep scientific disagreement on critical issues like the causes and impacts of warming.
EXCLUSIVE. Professor Richard Lindzen: There Will Be No Climate Catastrophe
Dr. Richard Lindzen, a distinguished atmospheric scientist, says that a half-degree of warming is far from being an existential threat: “People have to ask, what the hell are they talking about?”
