COP30 Is Lying To Justify Its Existence
COP30 is building its case on climate misinformation that rewrites the past to claim a victory it never earned.
The COP30 agreement claims the world was previously on track for more than 4C of warming until the Paris Agreement heroically “bent” that trajectory down to 2.3–2.5C:
However, “this is misinformation,” says Roger Pielke Jr., Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Colorado Boulder. It is a fiction built on the carcass of RCP8.5 — the extreme scenario that scientists quietly abandoned years ago because it required impossible coal use, implausible demographics and an economic collapse that never happened.
COP30 is resurrecting an unrealistic, disowned scenario in order to claim that Paris saved the world. The problem is the data. Real-world emissions show no curve bending, no slowdown and no “Paris effect”.
Paris didn’t change emissions, but it did unlock a permanent justification for climate taxation, energy rationing and the dismantling of cheap, reliable power — the foundation of economic prosperity.
COP30 needs a victory to justify its existence. So it has rewritten history: invent a 4C trajectory, pretend Paris knocked it down, and congratulate itself for saving humanity.
The world was never heading for RCP8.5. Paris didn’t change emissions.
Lies.
more news
The Misinformation Inquisition: How Censorship Shields Approved Narratives from Scrutiny
Tilak Doshi cautions that modern censorship, justified in the name of combating misinformation, increasingly functions as a tool to protect dominant narratives from challenge.
Good News Everyone! We hit ‘Peak Climate’ – Media Articles are in Decline
Good news to start 2026 with: globally, we have passed the peak of media coverage of climate alarmism.
The 2023 climate event revealed the greatest failure of climate science
Instead of trying to determine the causes (Hunga Tonga!) of the extraordinary climate events of 2023, scientists have attempted to fit them into the dominant theory using models, writes Javier Vinos. In doing so, they demonstrate the failure of that theory.
