COP30 Is Lying To Justify Its Existence
COP30 is building its case on climate misinformation that rewrites the past to claim a victory it never earned.
The COP30 agreement claims the world was previously on track for more than 4C of warming until the Paris Agreement heroically “bent” that trajectory down to 2.3–2.5C:
However, “this is misinformation,” says Roger Pielke Jr., Professor of Environmental Studies at the University of Colorado Boulder. It is a fiction built on the carcass of RCP8.5 — the extreme scenario that scientists quietly abandoned years ago because it required impossible coal use, implausible demographics and an economic collapse that never happened.
COP30 is resurrecting an unrealistic, disowned scenario in order to claim that Paris saved the world. The problem is the data. Real-world emissions show no curve bending, no slowdown and no “Paris effect”.
Paris didn’t change emissions, but it did unlock a permanent justification for climate taxation, energy rationing and the dismantling of cheap, reliable power — the foundation of economic prosperity.
COP30 needs a victory to justify its existence. So it has rewritten history: invent a 4C trajectory, pretend Paris knocked it down, and congratulate itself for saving humanity.
The world was never heading for RCP8.5. Paris didn’t change emissions.
Lies.
more news
Matt Ridley thinks the Climate Parrot is almost dead
In his recent ICSF/Clintel lecture, Matt Ridley argued that public and political momentum behind the “climate emergency” narrative is weakening, and he explored the reasons for this shift as well as its implications.
TOA EEI versus Surface Net Flux
Explore how climate scientist Andy May analyzes the relationship between TOA energy imbalance and surface net flux, challenging common interpretations in climate science.
Met Office temperature measurements unreliable and systematically biased
The article below by Chris Morrison clearly demonstrates that the reliability of temperature measurements in the United Kingdom is seriously lacking. Based on detailed research, Dr Eric Huxter shows that a large share of recorded temperature spikes is not the result of natural variation, but of artificial influences at poorly located measurement stations. This raises fundamental questions about the quality of the underlying data used for climate reporting and policy decisions.
