There is No Climate Emergency,
a Message to the People

See pdf here

Guus Berkhout, President of Clintel

In the past decades the public has been flooded with fear-mongering stories, telling them that global temperatures will rise to catastrophically high levels.

Climate activists claim that the cause of all this impending doom is the increasing amount of CO2 produced by human activities. The proposed solution is the so-called net-zero emission policy, aimed at lowering human net CO2-emissions to the levels of the pre-industrial era of the late 1700s.

Those activists also claim that people should panic, and that time is running out: “Be aware that it is five minutes to midnight, we must act without delay!” Many thousands of scientists disagree;



are Clintel signatories.

Antonio Guterres, big boss of the UN

Greta Thunberg, teen climate activist

In his numerous ‘last warning’ speeches, Antonio Guterres refers to computer simulations, not the real world. Greta Thunberg testified to the US Congress that there was ‘no science’ behind her ‘panic’ comment.  This info cannot be found in the media.

So why is there such a big difference between the scaring climate activists’ narrative and the optimistic climate scientists’ message, who believe there is no climate emergency? Please, before you continue reading, watch our message: Consensus meet CLINTEL

Not many citizens are aware that all the frightening climate predictions have been generated by computer models. And we know from experience in many other complex areas, how misleading computer models can be.

For example, think of the many wrong predictions by economic models or think of the large mistakes in recent pandemic modeling. The output of computer models depends fully on the assumptions that modelmakers put into them. In the past 50 years, the predictions of climate models about global warming and their dire effects have all been wrong. In the engineering community, they would be qualified as useless.

More specifically, the assumptions in climate modeling are such that predicted temperature changes turn out to be persistently too high. Even worse, extreme weather events – such as heatwaves, droughts, floods, hurricanes etc. – are intentionally used to support the extreme climate predictions. But if we position the current extreme weather events in a historical context, we see that these events are ‘climate business as usual’. See Goklany, 2020.

The conclusion is that models (computer simulations) run ‘too hot’ and that predictions of adverse effects on humans are highly dubious. They project a catastrophic future that is not born out by observations. It is much wiser and safer to rely on measurements. The history of science tells us that significant steps forward are always fueled by observations from new measurement instruments.

Think of the very recent spectacular images of outer space by the new James Webb Space Telescope. The same good news applies to the modern satellites that deliver high-quality measurements around the Earth since 1979. Satellite data shows NO extreme warming, and this is cross-checked by millions of weather balloon measurements.

Therefore, let us make use of the abundant temperature measurements made through the years. Those from the beginning of the industrial period (1850) until the present (2020) we see in Figure 1. Measurements tell us that the temperature in 2020 is 1.1 oC higher than in 1850.

Figure 1: Global temperature curve as currently generally accepted from 1850-2020. If we extend the measurements to 2050, we see that the temperature is 1.6 oC higher than in 1850 (‘X-warming’).

Using Figure 1, let us extrapolate the satellite temperatures to the year 2050 by assuming that the temperature increase of the past 40 years (1980-2020) will carry on without any pausing and cooling. This generous projection results in a 2050-temperature that is 1.6oC higher than in 1850. Now, here is the big question: ‘Is the global warming of 1.6oC a scary result? Does this outcome really tell us that it is ‘five minutes to midnight’?

Let us look at today’s difference in mean temperature between Oslo (one of the big cities near the North Pole) and Singapore (one of the big cities near the Equator), see Figure 2. Measurements show that the difference is as much as 22oC, twenty times bigger than the global warming between 1850 and 2020 and almost 14 times bigger than the so-called ‘scary’ global warming between 1850 and 2050.

Despite of this huge mean temperature difference of 22oC, both cities are very prosperous and the citizens in both cities are enjoying life. So, why do the media tell us that a global warming of 1.6oC or more will lead to a disaster (“the end is near”), while 22oC difference between Oslo and Singapore turns out to be no problem whatsoever?

Figure 2: Global mean temperature from 1850-2050, together with the average temperature of the prospering cities Oslo and Singapore in 2020. Note that the global warming of 1.6 °C is marginal with respect to the difference of 22 °C between the two cities (almost factor 14)

The answer is adaptation! Mankind shows an impressive history, having survived many big changes in its living environment, including big changes in the Earth’s climate. Thanks to our ingenuity, human beings have always found clever solutions to cope with all past challenges, again and again. If you visit Oslo and Singapore, you see an impressive demonstration of human’s capability to adapt to climate differences of 22oC.

There is another interesting observation to make. Gradual global warming is not a serious problem, whether it is caused by CO2 or not. Not mitigation but adaptation is the solution. So, for all of those who would like to think that the present global warming is fully caused by CO2, our conclusion stays unchanged.

Bear in mind that during the cooling period around 1900 and the temperature pause in the sixties (see Figure 1), the CO2-concentration in the atmosphere continued to increase without delay. Hence, the anomalous temperature behavior in these two periods were indisputably caused by mother nature. The same applies for the large climate difference between Oslo and Singapore.

Finally, for those who still believe that CO2-emissions are pollution, we urge you to remember that CO2 is essential for all life on Earth. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global biomass. It is also very favorable for agriculture, increasing crop yields worldwide.

If also this fact of life isn’t sufficient convincingly, please realize that with the availability of modern nuclear power plants we have ample time to create a global energy system with largely zero emission. But again, the big question is whether zero emission is a sensible goal.

In conclusion, don’t let the terrifying stories of supranational institutions – such as the UN, EU and WEF – scare you. Particularly, climate alarmists must not use extreme weather events to poison our children with fear:

The gradual global warming, which started around 1700 after the end of the Little Ice Age, is a fact and has not caused any serious problem. Our advice is: “Enjoy today’s climate, because stories from the Little Ice Age tell us that a cold climate is full of hardship”.

If we continue to invest in innovation, mankind can easily cope with any effect of further warming. Hence, we must stop the demoralizing back-to-the-past mitigation solutions. We observe that it only leads to decline and poverty.

Instead, we must focus on the power of adaptation, based on science, technology, and education. It will lead us into an era of prosperity for nature and mankind. Please, join our journey!


Climate related deaths (floods, droughts, storms, wildfires, extreme temperatures) have declined precipitously because richer and more resilient societies reduce disaster deaths and swamp any potential climate signal.

Thirty years of climate summits have had no discernible effect on the rise in atmospheric CO2 concentration. These summits cost an enormous amount of money. Money which can be better spent on adaptation measures.

Guus Berkhout is emeritus-professor of geophysics, member of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW)


1. Mario Marquinez Otálora, Argentina
2. Tim Davidson, Australia
3. Craig Davis, Australia
4. Anthony Grigor-Scott, Australia
5. Paul Hamilton, Australia
6. Alan Kennett, Australia
7. Nicholas Loades, Australia
8. Nuraini Magnusson, Australia
9. Patrick O’Meley, Australia
10. Ian Storey, Australia
11. Lynette Sunderland, Australia
12. Ingvar Warnholtz, Australia
13. Gerhard Ing. Lassnig, Austria
14. Karin E.J. Kolland, Austria
15. Franz Promock, Austria
16. Sebastien Calebout, Belgium
17. Bart Decroix, Belgium
18. Jelle D’Helft, Belgium
19. Mieke Franquet, Belgium
20. Luc Pintens, Belgium
21. Francisco Mendes Moraes, Brazil
22. Leif Andersen, Canada
23. patricia bowman, Canada
24. Ivanna Broesky, Canada
25. Robert Daye, Canada
26. Craig Horner, Canada
27. Leslie Keighan, Canada
28. Howard Phelan, Canada
29. Michal Princ, Canada
30. Derwyn Ross, Canada
31. Dr Howard Tenenbaum, Canada
32. Lyndon Trombley, Canada
33. Enrique Casanovas, Chile
34. Jonothan Keir Sims, China
35. charles hope, Cyprus
36. Daniel Markvart, Czechia
37. Jiri Strachota, Czechia
38. Kaspar Bonde Eriksen, Denmark
39. Hugh Sharman, Denmark
40. Juhani Anttila, Finland
41. Ricol Fabien, France
42. Lucien Oulahbib, France
43. Peter Taylor, France
44. Noirtault Thierry, France
45. Achim Benoit, Germany
46. Christian Bickeböller, Germany
47. José de la Iglesia, Germany
48. Nikolai Dick, Germany
49. Adelbert Herzog, Germany
50. Christopher Hesse, Germany
51. Lynda Matschke, Germany
52. Kiana Meier-Friedhoff, Germany
53. Michael Wegener, Germany
54. Georgios Zikos, Greece
55. Nigel Lawrence, Guernsey
56. Bence Gabor Peter, Hungary
57. Pandu Wisaksono, Indonesia
58. Terry O Sullivan, Ireland
59. Rabbi Gabriel Cousens MD, Israel
60. Massimiliano Diodati, Italy
61. Laura Fanfani, Italy
62. Maurizio Tambani, Italy
63. Vincenzo Trainito, Italy
64. Giancarlo Troiani, Italy
65. Giorgio Vismara, Italy
66. Carlo Besenius, Luxembourg
67. Paul Claes, Netherlands
68. Willem Hageman, Netherlands
69. Rene Houthoff, Netherlands
70. Dick Kraaijenbrink, Netherlands
71. Paul Markus, Netherlands
72. Sandro Stoffers, Netherlands
73. Duncan Christie, New Zealand
74. Bruce C Collings, New Zealand
75. Jesper Siegfried Enerstvedt, Norway
76. Nina Jonsson, Norway
77. Vivi-Ann Sandnes, Norway
78. Alain Charles Veloso, Philippines
79. Pablo de la Fuente de Pablo, Poland
80. Szymon G??bski, Poland
81. Rui Abreu, Portugal
82. Flavio Barbara, Portugal
83. Alexander Rodriguez, Singapore
84. Milos Dian, Slovakia
85. Milan Gábor, Slovakia
86. Lore-lei Cerqueira, South Africa
87. Jan Tredoux, South Africa
88. Leopoldo Abadia, Spain
89. Manuel Espejo, Spain
90. José María Fernandez-Bravo Álvarez, Spain
91. Luis Garcia, Spain
92. José Ignacio Herreras Espinosa, Spain
93. Antonio Lista, Spain
94. Javier Miguel Gonzalez, Spain
95. Vicente Nomdedeu, Spain
96. gert-jan mathijs oepkes, Spain
97. Ricardo Pascual Iglesias, Spain
98. Pedro Reche, Spain
99. Elena Simó, Spain
100. INGE BJART Torkildsen, Spain
101. Carlos Urrutia Nebreda, Spain
102. Zhamuel Boij, Sweden
103. Erika Brandt, Sweden
104. Janos Vrbata, Switzerland
105. Gordon Ballantyne, United Kingdom
106. Keith Brown, United Kingdom
107. Kevan Chippindall-Higgin, United Kingdom
108. Aidan Condie, United Kingdom
109. Michael Davies, United Kingdom
110. Ruth Ferguson, United Kingdom
111. Patrick Fossett, United Kingdom
112. Michael Gilding, United Kingdom
113. Kenneth Gorman, United Kingdom
114. Solomon Green, United Kingdom
115. Martin Haywood-Samuel, United Kingdom
116. John Howes, United Kingdom
117. Toni Ives, United Kingdom
118. Bryan Johnston, United Kingdom
119. Bethany Jukes, United Kingdom
120. Howard Koolman, United Kingdom
121. Andrew Mackay, United Kingdom
122. George Magklaras, United Kingdom
123. RICHARD Maguire, United Kingdom
124. David Martin, United Kingdom
125. Gerrard Mccluskey, United Kingdom
126. Stephen J. Medlock, United Kingdom
127. Hilary Muggridge, United Kingdom
128. Robert Nellist, United Kingdom
129. andrea pearson, United Kingdom
130. Stephen Peliza, United Kingdom
131. Vela Rasarathnam, United Kingdom
132. Yvonne Ross, United Kingdom
133. Leo Rutherford, United Kingdom
134. Catherine Shipley, United Kingdom
135. Angie Stone, United Kingdom
136. Charles Tannett, United Kingdom
137. Desmond Thompson, United Kingdom
138. Neil Wilkes, United Kingdom
139. D. Williams, United Kingdom
140. Nigel Wilson, United Kingdom
141. Greg Abell, United States of America
142. Paul Allyn, United States of America
143. Roger Ayotte, United States of America
144. Michele Baxter, United States of America
145. Richard Bay, United States of America
146. Charles Bellavia, United States of America
147. Thomas Bingel, United States of America
148. Mark Brody, United States of America
149. Robert Broe, United States of America
150. Sue A. Brown, United States of America
151. Janice Bryson, United States of America
152. Kevin Burger, United States of America
153. John Byrne, United States of America
154. Jeff Campbell, United States of America
155. Joseph Chiaro, United States of America
156. Pamela Cornelius, United States of America
157. Charley Cropley, United States of America
158. Jeff Davison, United States of America
159. Grant Dixon, United States of America
160. William Dondarski, United States of America
161. Benn Dover, United States of America
162. Vincent A. Ettari, United States of America
163. David Fair, United States of America
164. Jonathan Frishberg, United States of America
165. Bernardo Garza, United States of America
166. Christine Goodwin, United States of America
167. Gio Batta Gori, United States of America
168. Shelley Graham, United States of America
169. Donny Griffin, United States of America
170. Curt Hanson, United States of America
171. MICHAEL HARTMAN, United States of America
172. Harvey Hnatiuk, United States of America
173. David Houghland MD, United States of America
174. Timothy Kearney, United States of America
175. Marvin Langston, United States of America
176. Ted Laskaris, United States of America
177. Robert R. Lerma, United States of America
178. Robert McCarter, United States of America
179. James McGough, United States of America
180. Linda Mckenzie, United States of America
181. Aaron McKissack, United States of America
182. Geoffrey McNiven, United States of America
183. Jim Medlar, United States of America
184. Ed Meyer, United States of America
185. Rodney Michael, United States of America
186. William Moye, United States of America
187. Kimon Nicolaides, United States of America
188. Arnold Nordeng, United States of America
189. Naomi Nye, United States of America
190. Jeffery Osborn, United States of America
191. Judith Osterman, United States of America
192. John Pearrow, United States of America
193. Bernard Raad, United States of America
194. Phyllis Rampulla, United States of America
195. Miriano “Max” Ravazzolo, United States of America
196. James Rice, United States of America
197. Anita Roche, United States of America
198. Charles G. Sandell DMD, United States of America
199. Ed Sebesta, United States of America
200. Marina Shea, United States of America
201. Deborah Simpkins, United States of America
202. Christopher Snyder, United States of America
203. James Spence MD FACP FCCP, United States of America
204. Richard F. Storm, United States of America
205. Tatiana Sugar, United States of America
206. Doug Swartout, United States of America
207. Don Thompson, United States of America
208. Jeffrey Tschida, United States of America
209. Gary L. Wade, United States of America
210. James Waldo, United States of America
211. Glenn Weckel, United States of America
212. Stacy Wick, United States of America
213. James Colin Wright, United States of America