By JOHN H. COCHRANE Originally published at National Review Climate policy is ultimately an economic question. How much does climate change hurt? How much do various policy ideas actually help, and what do they cost? You don’t have to argue with one line of the IPCC scientific reports to disagree with climate policy that doesn’t make [...]
By Andy May Dr. Ronan Connolly and his co-authors respond to obvious false claims, in a supposed “fact check” about their latest paper on how solar variability may be affecting the climate. We applaud Dr. Ronan Connolly, Dr. Willie Soon, and Dr. Michael Connolly for rapidly and publicly calling out this fraudulent fact check. Misinformation [...]
Danish scientist Bjorn Lomborg has reacted sharply on the claim of over 200 medical journals, earlier this month, that there are significant health risks to any temperature rise. He concludes that there are very basic mistakes underlying the alarmist claims and send the following letter to the editor of The Lancet, one of the journals [...]
By David Wojick It is less than 60 days until COP26 convenes in Glasgow. We can expect a flood of climate horror stories (including flooding). But there will also be some discussion of the actual issues, so here is a brief breakdown of the big four. Keep in mind that the alarmists have a bit [...]
By Andy May A Dutch joke*: “The Judge asks an attorney pleading his case: ‘Am I ever to hear the truth?’ The attorney responds: ‘No, my Lord, only the evidence.'” It is safe to say that no evidence exists that man-made climate change has harmed anyone. Further man-made climate or climate change [...]
Vor einigen Tagen verlinkten wir an dieser Stelle einen Beitrag von Sebastian Lüning in der Weltwoche zur Mittelalterlichen Wärmeperiode. Der Beitrag befand sich hinter einer Aboschranke, so dass viele von Ihnen möglicherweise den Beitrag noch nicht kennen. EIKE hat nun dankenswerterweise die Erlaubnis der Weltwoche zum Vollabdruck erhalten, so dass wir den Artikel auch hier bringen können: Dieser [...]
European Court of Human Rights Earlier this week, CLINTEL submitted a petition to the European Court of Human Rights to be allowed to participate in a climate law suit initiated by climate activists against 33 countries. The case is known as the DUARTE case. We previously filed a similar request, which the court denied [...]
© CLINTEL Foundation - / Friday 27 August, 2021 The IPCC Hockey Stick is back! By Marcel Crok and Prof. dr. ir. Guus Berkhout, founders CLINTEL After eight years finally a new IPCC report is out, called AR6, and the media is freaking out: 'Climate change is now suddenly going faster [...]
The Greenhouse Effect Explained by David Siegel, see original post here People like Al Gore think that the greenhouse effect is like a blanket, where the atmosphere, which in 1960 had 3 molecules per 10,000 of CO2 and now has 4 out of 10,000, smothers the earth, preventing heat from escaping. In their [...]
After 8 years the IPCC finally published a new Assessment Report, called AR6. The media went wild: climate change is going faster than ever; extremes are increasing; it has become close to impossible to stay under the 1.5 Celsius target and sea level rise is irreversible. And on and on and on... CLINTEL [...]
