INTERVIEW. Dr. Judith Curry on Global Warming: Where Is the Danger?
Renowned climatologist Dr. Judith Curry says it is very tough to make the case of warming becoming dangerous.
Renowned climatologist Dr. Judith Curry says it is very tough to make the case of warming becoming dangerous.
Marty Rowland PhD has been fired from his position as Special Issue Editor at the American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES), because of publication of the paper Carbon Dioxide and a Warming Climate are not problems by Andy May and Marcel Crok. Andy May examines the reasons behind this Orwellian dismissal in this article.
Marty Rowland, PhD, a été licencié de son poste de rédacteur en chef du Numéro Spécial de l'American Journal of Economics and Sociology (AJES), suite à la publication de l'article « Le dioxyde de carbone et le réchauffement climatique ne sont pas des problèmes » d'Andy May et Marcel Crok. Andy May examine dans cet article les raisons de ce licenciement orwellien.
The US State Department issued a joint statement denouncing Net Zero policies for global marine shipping as a 'global carbon tax,' says Friends of Science Society. Small Pacific Islands requested an International Court of Justice (ICJ) advisory statement on climate obligations claiming existential crisis; but many hypocritically provide marine registry services.
Während alarmistische Studien sich in Europa wie ein Lauffeuer verbreiten, wird der bahnbrechende Bericht „A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate” (Eine kritische Überprüfung der Auswirkungen von Treibhausgas-Emissionen auf das Klima der USA) völlig ignoriert. Dieser Bericht widmet sich endlich ausdrücklich den Unsicherheiten, alternativen Erkenntnissen und faktischen Beobachtungen in der Klimawissenschaft. Das Schweigen Europas ist nicht nur bemerkenswert, es ist geradezu schockierend. Es wirft einen Schatten auf die intellektuelle Ehrlichkeit der europäischen Klimadebatte.
Alors que des études alarmistes se répandent comme une traînée de poudre en Europe, le rapport révolutionnaire « A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the US Climate » est totalement ignoré. Ce rapport accorde enfin une attention explicite aux incertitudes, aux perspectives alternatives et aux observations factuelles de la science climatique. Le silence européen est non seulement remarquable, mais aussi choquant. Il jette une ombre sur l'honnêteté intellectuelle du débat européen sur le climat.
While alarmist studies are spreading like wildfire in Europe, the groundbreaking report A Critical Review of Impacts of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on the U.S. Climate is being completely ignored. This report finally pays explicit attention to uncertainties, alternative insights, and factual observations in climate science. The European silence is not only remarkable, it is downright shocking. It casts a shadow over the intellectual honesty of the European climate debate.
The title of this post is borrowed from Marcoen Cabbolet’s recent paper. Its abstract is the following, but I warmly recommend reading the entire paper.
a highly distinguished university professor was persecuted for merely doing his scientific work: founded on evidence and proper reasoning, questioning scientific theories
Renowned climatologist Dr. Judith Curry debunks the myth of a climate consensus, revealing deep scientific disagreement on critical issues like the causes and impacts of warming.