In his first of two recent lectures for Clintel, Roger Pielke Jr. examined the politicized debate over climate change. His central argument was that climate change is real and deserves serious attention, but that public discussion frequently goes far beyond what the scientific evidence supports. He also described how he was a target of political attacks, including some from the Obama White House.
Nepal’s request for a foreign response to the country’s disastrous Himalayan flood would be better made as an appeal to the charitable instincts of people than as a demand for compensation from climate sinners, says Angela Wheeler.
La ciencia de la atribución se está utilizando para justificar demandas judiciales y narrativas mediáticas sobre una catástrofe climática, en lugar de avanzar en la comprensión científica, afirmó Ralph Alexander en su reciente conferencia Clintel/ICSF.
« La science de l’attribution est utilisée pour justifier des poursuites judiciaires et des récits médiatiques sur une catastrophe climatique plutôt que de faire progresser la compréhension scientifique », a déclaré Ralph Alexander lors de sa récente conférence Clintel/ICSF.
Attribution Science is being used to justify lawsuits and media narratives about a climate catastrophe rather than to advance scientific understanding, said Ralph Alexander in his recent Clintel/ICSF Lecture.
