Attribution Science is being used to justify lawsuits and media narratives about a climate catastrophe rather than to advance scientific understanding, said Ralph Alexander in his recent Clintel/ICSF Lecture.
Una nueva edición de un manual de educación científica para jueces se aparta “drásticamente” de una “larga tradición de neutralidad”, según afirman tres de los físicos más distinguidos de Estados Unidos en una carta dirigida al presidente de la Corte Suprema, John Roberts.
Une nouvelle édition d'un manuel d'enseignement scientifique destiné aux juges s'écarte « nettement » d'une « longue tradition de neutralité », affirment trois des physiciens américains les plus éminents dans une lettre adressée au juge en chef de la Cour suprême des États-Unis, John Roberts.
A new edition of a science education manual for judges departs “sharply” from a “longstanding tradition of neutrality,” say three of America’s most distinguished physicists in a letter to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts.
In a significant move for scientific accountability, a U.S. federal judge has removed a controversial climate change chapter from a key judicial reference manual. The decision challenges the dominance of model-based climate narratives in the courts and signals a renewed emphasis on empirical evidence and institutional integrity.
Another ‘scientific’ attack on the oil majors [...]
